Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Ezell et al v. Cassidy et al
as 2:2021cv00474
Plaintiff:
LaShawn Ezell, Troshawn McCoy, Charles Johnson and others
Defendant:
Kenneth Boudreau, Bernard Ryan, Francis Valadez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Hempel et al v. Cydan Development, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00008
Defendant:
Cydan Development, Inc., Cydan II, Inc., Sucampo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Addison Hempel, Cassidy Hempel, Christine Hempel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00725
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Nationwide Life Insurance Company et al v. Millberg et al
as 2:2014cv01586
Defendant:
Cassidy Cotten, First Bank of Delaware, Fortris Financial, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Nationwide Life Insurance Company and Nationwide Life and Annuity Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Cox vs. Randazza, et al.,
as 2:2013cv00297
Defendant:
AOL Inc., APPLE, David S. Aman, OR and others
Plaintiff:
Crystal L Cox
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Randazza et al v. Cox et al
as 2:2012cv02040
Counter Defendant:
David S. Aman, David S. Aman, Apple and others
Defendant:
Eliot Bernstein and Crystal L Cox
Cross Defendant:
Bernie Cassidy and Jessica Griffin Godaddy
Counter Claimant:
Crystal L Cox and Crystal L Cox
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Randazza, Marc J Randazza and Natalia Randazza
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Turnbow et al v. Life Partners, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00290
Interested Party:
M.D. Donald T. Cassidy
Defendant:
Life Partners Holdings, Inc., Life Partners, Inc., Brian D. Pardo and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Rice, William Rice, Anthony Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
