Cases 21 - 28 of 28
CASSIS v. AMERICAN EXPORT LINES INC.
as 2:2010cv42679
Plaintiff:
CARLOS CASSIS
Defendant:
AMERICAN EXPORT LINES INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
JONES et al v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv79106
Plaintiff:
CASSIE R. JONES and VIVIAN S. JONES
Defendant:
RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC., GAF CORPORATION, H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARTER v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv73678
Plaintiff:
CASSIE B. CARTER, JR.
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Thirdparty_defendant:
JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MITCHELL et al v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv91101
Plaintiff:
SHARON D MITCHELL, SHARON D MITCHELL, CASSIE B DORTCH and others
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC., A. W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
OWSLEY et al v. CROWN CORK AND SEAL COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv79616
Plaintiff:
LANGLEY OWSLEY, LANGLEY OWSLEY, CASSIE OWSLEY and others
Defendant:
CROWN CORK AND SEAL COMPANY, GARLOCK, INC., GARLOCK, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
PRESTON v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2009cv76628
Plaintiff:
CASSIE R. PRESTON
Defendant:
A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, A.W. CHESTERTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BOCSY et al v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2008cv01482
Plaintiff:
DAVID S. BOCSY and JAMES J. BOCSY
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY, REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
WINDHAM v. ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2008cv66760
Plaintiff:
CASSIE WINDHAM and CASSIE WINDHAM
Defendant:
ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
