Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 21 - 28 of 28
WESTMINSTER FINANCIAL SERVICES, LTD. et al v. RHINOCEROS INVESTMENTS, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv01269
Plaintiff: WESTMINSTER FINANCIAL SERVICES, LTD. and CENTIMARK CORPORATION
Defendant: RHINOCEROS INVESTMENTS, LLC, STEVEN C. MURPHY and PAMELA B. MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CENTIMARK CORPORATION v. CONWAY et al
as 2:2010cv00886
Plaintiff: CENTIMARK CORPORATION
Defendant: BRENDAN CONWAY, VQUEST LLC, VQUEST CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BUDDY'S PLANT PLUS CORP. v. CENTIMARK CORPORATION We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv00670
Plaintiff: BUDDY'S PLANT PLUS CORP.
Defendant: CENTIMARK CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BUDDY'S PLANT PLUS CORPORATION v. CENTIMARK CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv00413
Plaintiff: BUDDY'S PLANT PLUS CORPORATION
Defendant: CENTIMARK CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
CENTIMARK CORPORATION v. HIGHLAND COMMERCIAL ROOFING, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv01244
Plaintiff: CENTIMARK CORPORATION
Defendant: HIGHLAND COMMERCIAL ROOFING, LLC and ERIK ROBERT ELLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Type: Contract Plaintiff
CENTIMARK CORPORATION v. TECTA AMERICA CORP. et al
as 2:2008cv00594
Plaintiff: CENTIMARK CORPORATION
Defendant: TECTA AMERICA CORP., VINCENT J. VITEK and PATRICK J. HANSEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
CENTIMARK CORPORATION v. TECTA AMERICA CORP. et al
as 2:2008cv00593
Plaintiff: CENTIMARK CORPORATION
Defendant: TECTA AMERICA CORP., VINCENT J. VITEK and PATRICK J. HANSEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
CENTIMARK CORPORATION v. SAFFOLD
as 2:2007cv00342
Plaintiff: CENTIMARK CORPORATION and CENTIMARK CORPORATION
Defendant: MICHAEL SAFFOLD and MICHAEL SAFFOLD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?