Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Century Aluminum Company, et al v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London
as 23-5543
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CENTURY ALUMINUM COMPANY, CENTURY KENTUCKY, INC., CENTURY ALUMINUM OF KENTUCKY GENERAL PARTNERSHIP and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S OF LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO CERTIFICATES NOS. TTH2142217JA, MIFB06363A17, CA17FV169PSX, MI9383GAA, 17CA287519TA, PO3784917AA, M19977BAA059, 57974A17AAG, 1665V17OAVNA, 82619O6117JF, AND 74857K17AA
Century Aluminum Company et al v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London Subscribing to Certificates Nos. TTH2142217JA, MIFB06363A17, CA17FV169PSX, MI9383GAA, 17CA287519TA, PO3784917AA, M19977BAA059, 57974A17AAG, 1665V170AVNA, 82
as 4:2018cv00118
Plaintiff:
Century Aluminum Sebree, LLC, Century Aluminum Company, Century Kentucky, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London Subscribing to Certificates Nos. TTH2142217JA, MIFB06363A17, CA17FV169PSX, MI9383GAA, 17CA287519TA, PO3784917AA, M19977BAA059, 57974A17AAG, 1665V170AVNA, 82
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kevin Littlepage v. Century Aluminum Company, et al
as 17-5486
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN LITTLEPAGE
Defendant - Appellee:
CENTURY ALUMINUM COMPANY, LEHIGH OUTFITTERS, LLC and ROCKY BRANDS, INC.
Littlepage v. Century Aluminum Company et al
as 4:2015cv00159
Plaintiff:
Kevin Littlepage
Defendant:
Century Aluminum Company, Lehigh Outfitters, LLC and Rocky Brands, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dewhurst et al v. Century Aluminum Company et al
as 2:2009cv01033
Plaintiff:
Harold Dewhurst, David Bryan and United Steel , Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union
Defendant:
Century Aluminum Company, Century Aluminum of West Virginia, Inc. and Century Aluminum Master Welfare Benefit Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
