Contract Cases filed in California
Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London v. STG Logistics, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv08364
Plaintiff: Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London
Defendant: STG Logistics, Inc., XPO Logistics, Inc., CTS Global Supply Chain Solutions and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London v. STG Logistics, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv06927
Plaintiff: Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London
Defendant: STG Logistics, Inc., XPO Logistics Freight, Inc., CTS Global Supply Chain Solutions and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd' s, London v. Allied Professionals Insurance Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2022cv01852
Plaintiff: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd' s, London
Defendant: Allied Professionals Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London Subscribing to Policy No. 600230 v. Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv06188
Petitioner: Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London Subscribing to Policy No. 600230
Respondent: Expeditors International of Washington Inc, Expeditors International Ocean and Doe
Not Classified By Court: Stephen M Uthoff
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81 Damaged Goods While Being Transported
PEAG LLC et al v. Flexport International LLC
as 3:2021cv09376
Plaintiff: PEAG LLC and Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London
Defendant: Flexport International LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London Subscribing to Policy No. 600230 v. Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv08951
Plaintiff: Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London Subscribing to Policy No. 600230
Defendant: Expeditors International of Washington, Inc., Expeditors International Ocean and Doe
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London Subscribing To Policy No. B1510MA000012F v. Starlink Freight System (Sfo), Inc.
as 3:2021cv08361
Plaintiff: Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London Subscribing To Policy No. B1510MA000012F
Defendant: Starlink Freight System (Sfo), Inc.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81
Garza v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London Subscribing to the Subject Property et al
as 1:2020cv01639
Plaintiff: Matthew S Garza
Defendant: International Specialty Insurance, Inc., Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London Subscribing to the Subject Property and Paradigm - Gilbert Insurance Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
PHL Variable Insurance Company v. Continental Casualty Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv06799
Plaintiff: PHL Variable Insurance Company
Defendant: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London Subscribing to Policy No. SPRFW1701180, Continental Casualty Company, Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London Subscribing to Policy No. SPRFW1701179 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company et al v. Lexington Insurance Company, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00959
3Rd Party Plaintiff: American International Specialty Lines Insurance Company and Lexington Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Travelers Property Casualty Company of America, St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company and others
Defendant: Does 1 through 10 inclusive, AIG Specialty Insurance Company and Chartis Specialty Insurance Company
3Rd Party Defendant: National Fire and Marine Insurance Company, Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London, First Mercury Insurance Company and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: Margaret A Levy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?