Cases 1 - 10 of 35
HALL v. WILLIAMS et al
as 2:2023cv00773
Petitioner:
Carlese J. Hall
Respondent:
Charles Williams, Arcola Washington-Adduci, Patricia V Bradley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kuc v. Warden Needly
as 7:2023cv00433
Petitioner:
Elizabeth Ann Kuc, Auntie and Beth
Respondent:
Warden Needly and Chad Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Calloway v. Garrett
as 7:2023cv00084
Petitioner:
Suzzett Marie Calloway
Respondent:
Chad Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Beckley v. Garrett et al
as 7:2022cv01132
Petitioner:
Brooke Beckley
Respondent:
Chad Garrett and BOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Tragas v. Garrett et al
as 7:2022cv00899
Petitioner:
Joanne Tragas
Respondent:
Chad Garrett, Neely, Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Singleton v. Chad
as 7:2022cv00844
Petitioner:
Cheryl Singleton
Respondent:
United States of America and Chad Garrett, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Joseph v. Garrett
as 7:2022cv00809
Petitioner:
Jazsmine Arielle Joseph
Respondent:
Chad Garrett and Neeley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Norris v. Garrett
as 7:2022cv00776
Petitioner:
Angel Renee Norris
Respondent:
Chad Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rodriguez v. Garrett
as 7:2022cv00734
Petitioner:
Ileana Rodriguez
Respondent:
Chad Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Metts v. Garrett
as 7:2022cv00561
Petitioner:
Carmelita C Metts
Respondent:
Chad Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
