Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Chandler v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv08032
Petitioner:
David Ronald Chandler
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Chandler v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv08027
Petitioner:
David Ronald Chandler
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Chandler v. United States of America
as 2:2014cv01133
Plaintiff:
Eddie Michael Chandler
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chandler v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2013cv00447
Plaintiff:
John Thomas Chandler
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Corizon Health Services, Kim T Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chandler v. Allen et al
as 2:2013cv00237
Plaintiff:
Eddie Chandler
Defendant:
Carter Franklin Allen and Larry Amerson
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chandler v. State of Alabama
as 2:2013cv00109
Petitioner:
Eddie Michael Chandler
Respondent:
State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Elliott v. Mendheim et al
as 2:2012cv02096
Plaintiff:
Gene Chandler Elliott, Jr
Defendant:
Brady Eutaw Mendheim and Mary B Windom
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chandler v. United States of America
as 1:2012cv08016
Petitioner:
Eddie Michael Chandler
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Chandler v. Alabama Department of Corrections
as 5:2011cv02833
Plaintiff:
Dorman Dean Chandler
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections and staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coats v. Rich et al
as 5:2011cv01895
Plaintiff:
Gary Neil Coats
Defendant:
Vanessa Rich, Janis Williams, Mike Blakely and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
