Cases 11 - 20 of 26
CHANEL, INC. v. WILLIAMS et al
as 2:2015cv07287
Plaintiff:
CHANEL, INC.
Defendant:
KIMBERLY WILLIAMS and DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
CHANEL, INC. v. CONWAY STORES INC. et al
as 2:2014cv06348
Plaintiff:
CHANEL, INC.
Defendant:
CONWAY STORES INC., NATIONAL STORES INC., I&K VENDING INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
CHANEL, INC. v. MATOS et al
as 1:2014cv03509
Plaintiff:
CHANEL, INC.
Defendant:
RAFAEL MATOS and DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
O'NEAL v. LORD & TAYLOR LLC. et al
as 2:2013cv03146
Plaintiff:
VERONICA O'NEAL
Defendant:
LORD & TAYLOR LLC. , CHANEL INC. , NRDC EQUITY PARTNERS and others
Cross_claimant:
CHANEL INC.
Cross_defendant:
CHANEL INC. , JOHN DOE 1-5, JOHN DOE 11-15 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CHANEL, INC. v. FUSION PERFUMES CORPORATION et al
as 2:2012cv02632
Plaintiff:
CHANEL, INC.
Defendant:
FUSION PERFUMES CORPORATION, FUSION PERFUMES INC., HIGH CLASS PERFUMES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
CHANEL, INC. v. PERFUME ISLAND, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv01709
Plaintiff:
CHANEL, INC.
Defendant:
PERFUME ISLAND, LLC, SHEIKH AHMED and DOES-1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
CHANEL, INC. v. DE et al
as 2:2010cv00586
Plaintiff:
CHANEL, INC.
Defendant:
LOU YIN DE, WU DAN WEI and DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
CHANEL, INC. v. WANG et al
as 2:2010cv00590
Plaintiff:
CHANEL, INC.
Defendant:
YING WANG and DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
CHANEL, INC. et al v. COCOBELL, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv03229
Plaintiff:
CHANEL, INC. and BEBE STORES, INC.
Defendant:
COCOBELL, INC., JEE W. YOON and DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
CHANEL, INC. v. GRANT et al
as 3:2008cv03392
Plaintiff:
CHANEL, INC.
Defendant:
OLUJIMI P. GRANT and DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
