Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Chapman Technology Group, Inc. v. RiskOptics, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00394
Plaintiff:
Chapman Technology Group, Inc.
Defendant:
RiskOptics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
Rowe v. Chapman et al
as 1:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Rowe
Defendant:
Steve Chapman, Matthew Rabinowitz, Roy Baynes and others
Lawrence v. Denbury, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01101
Plaintiff:
Richard Lawrence
Defendant:
Denbury, Inc., Kevin Meyers, Anthony Abate and others
Chapman v. Waters et al
as 1:2022cv01161
Plaintiff:
Marlin Chapman
Defendant:
Patrolman Samuel Waters, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adams et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00847
Plaintiff:
Christina Adams, Peter Eldridge, Jonathan Fessenden and others
Defendant:
Michael Brewer and Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Ameigh et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00839
Plaintiff:
Ginger Ameigh, Christi Baker, Robert Boepple and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Aboites et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00829
Plaintiff:
Cherilyn Aboites, Lois Allen, Carol Alsay and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Adams et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00776
Plaintiff:
Stacia Durst, Christopher Adams, Mike Alexander and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Ackermann et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00767
Plaintiff:
Kati Ackermann, Nicole Adkins, Angela Agosto and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Parshall v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Company et al
as 1:2021cv00504
Plaintiff:
James Parshall
Defendant:
Cooper Tire & Rubber Company, Tracey I. Joubert, Tyrone M. Jordan and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
