Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Joseph Antonetti v. Howard Skolnick, et al
as 13-16697
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH ANTONETTI
Defendant - Appellee:
HOWARD SKOLNICK, DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden, ISIDRO BACA and others
Michael Zellis v. Dwight Neven, et al
as 13-15881
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL J. ZELLIS
Defendant - Appellee:
DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden, CHARLENE CLARKSON, TRINITY PHARRIS and others
Peck v. Cox et al
as 2:2012cv01495
Defendant:
Isidro Baca, Charlene Clarkson, Catherine Cortez-Masto and others
Plaintiff:
Frank M. Peck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Antonetti v. Obama et al
as 3:2011cv00548
Defendant:
L.C. Adams, Jack Ames, Isidro Baca and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Antonetti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Antonetti v. Obama et al
as 3:2011cv00452
Defendant:
L.C. Adams, Jack Ames, Isidro Baca and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Antonetti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paul McCreary v. Rex Reed, et al
as 11-16237
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL THOMAS MCCREARY
Defendant - Appellee:
REX REED, Administrator of Offender Management, ARONIS, First Name Unknown, DEAL, First Name Unknown and others
George Luster v. Trinity Pharris, et al
as 10-16785
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE LUSTER
Defendant - Appellee:
TRINITY PHARRIS, CHARLENE CLARKSON, DWIGHT NEVEN and others
Alexander v. State Of Nevada et al
as 3:2010cv00429
Plaintiff:
Narviez V. Alexander
Defendant:
Isidro Baca, Renee Baker, Debra Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Antonetti v. Skolnick et al
as 3:2010cv00158
:
Defendant:
Isidro Baca, Charlene Clarkson, James Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph Antonetti v. Howard Skolnick, et al
as 09-17707
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH ANTONETTI
Defendant - Appellee:
HOWARD SKOLNICK, DWIGHT NEVEN, ISIDRO BACH and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
