Cases 31 - 40 of 73
SMITH v. U.S. CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES
as 2:2012mc00247
Petitioner:
CHARLES B. SMITH
Respondent:
U.S. CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES
Cause Of Action: Petition for Naturalization
SMITH et al v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv58756
Plaintiff:
CHARLES W SMITH and WILLARD E. BARTEL
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
SMITH et al v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv67005
Plaintiff:
CHARLES H. SMITH and HELEN G. SMITH
Defendant:
RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv66793
Plaintiff:
CHARLES H. SMITH
Defendant:
RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP.
as 2:2011cv64753
Plaintiff:
CHARLES K SMITH
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH et al v. H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC.
as 2:2011cv64662
Plaintiff:
CHARLES RAY SMITH and MARGENE MARILYN SMITH
Defendant:
H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv65103
Plaintiff:
CHARLES R SMITH and CONNIE JANE SMITH
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania et al
as 1:2011cv00264
Petitioner:
Charles E. Smith
Respondent:
Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania, Warden York County Prison and Dauphin County Adult Probation and Parole
Amicu:
Dauphin County District Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SMITH et al v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv60546
Plaintiff:
CHARLES F. SMITH and JUANITA SMITH
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC. , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. , CELOTEX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH et al v. A.W. CHESTERTON CO. et al
as 2:2010cv81564
Plaintiff:
CHARLES T. SMITH and VILMA MARIE SMITH
Defendant:
A.W. CHESTERTON CO. , AMERICAN ASBESTOS CO., ANCHOR PACKING CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
