Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Bell v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2018cv00582
Plaintiff:
Charles Bell
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Scott Kernan and C. Pfeiffer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steve Harris, et al v. Amgen, Inc., et al
as 17-55680
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STEVE HARRIS, DENNIS F. RAMOS, AKA Dennis Ramos, JORGE TORRES and others
Objector - Appellant:
DONALD HANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
AMGEN, INC., AMGEN MANUFACTURING, LIMITED, FRANK J. BIONDI, Jr. and others
Bell et al v. Bimbo Bakeries, USA et al
as 2:2015cv02410
Plaintiff:
Andrew Austin, Charles Bell, Bellion Corporation and others
Defendant:
Bimbo Bakeries, USA and Grupo Bimbo, S.A.B. De C.V.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
13-00001 IH Borrower LP v. Julia Bell et al
as 5:2015cv02276
Plaintiff:
2013-1 IH Borrower LP
Defendant:
Charles Bell, Julia Bell, Does and others
Bell v. Novo Nordisk Inc.
as 3:2014cv01617
Plaintiff:
Charles Bell
Defendant:
Novo Nordisk Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Charles Bell v. Ron Barne
as 13-56884
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES BELL
Respondent - Appellee:
RON BARNES, Warden
Salazar v. Bell et al
as 2:2011cv00762
Petitioner:
Tays Eaglet Salazar, Sr.
Respondent:
Charles Bell, San Quentin State Prison Warden, Sheri Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Steve Harris, et al v. Amgen, Inc., et al
as 10-56014
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVE HARRIS, DENNIS F. RAMOS, AKA Dennis Ramos, DONALD HANKS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
AMGEN, INC., AMGEN MANUFACTURING, LIMITED, FRANK J. BIONDI, Jr. and others
Defendant:
DENNIS M. FENTON, RICHARD NANULA, THE FIDUCIARY COMMITTEE and others
Donald Hanks v. Amgen, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv03973
Plaintiff:
Donald Hanks, Donald Hanks, Donald Hanks and others
Defendant:
Amgen, Inc., Kevin W. Sharer, Richard D. Nanula and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
