Cases 11 - 20 of 47
Pattison v. Lombardo, et al.
as 24-478
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANTE H PATTISON
Defendant / Appellee:
JOE LOMBARDO, BRIAN SANDOVAL, STEVE SISOLAK and others
Allen v. Daniels, et al.
as 23-3471
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TAIWAN ALLEN
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLES DANIELS, MICHAEL MINEV and ISIDRIS BACA
Cody v. DZS Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv00713
Plaintiff:
Robert Cody
Defendant:
DZS Inc., Charles Daniel Vogt and Misty Kawecki
Petitioner:
The Freedom Business Trust and The Life Trust, Keith Link and Trevor Milkins
Durand v. State of Nevada, et al.
as 23-1630
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERTO DURAND
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF NEVADA, ELY STATE PRISON, DR EXUM and others
Link v. DZS Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv00603
Plaintiff:
Keith Link and Trevor Milkins
Defendant:
DZS Inc., Charles Daniel Vogt and Misty Kawecki
Petitioner:
The Freedom Business Trust and The Life Trust
SHIM v. DZS INC et al
as 4:2023cv00549
Plaintiff:
JASON SHIM
Defendant:
DZS INC, Charles Daniel Vogt and Misty Kawecki
Daniels v. Novant Health Inc et al
as 1:2022cv00295
Plaintiff:
Charles Daniels, Jr. and Clarence Daniels, Jr.
Defendant:
Novant Health Inc, Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority, The, Mecklenburg EMS Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Clervrain et al v. Ebert et al
as 3:2022cv00168
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Emmanuel Benjoassaint, Kaity Borgella and others
Defendant:
Jhone Ebert, Charles Daniels, Ann Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Michael Lujan v. Charles Daniels, et al
as 21-16883
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL VINCENT LUJAN
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLES DANIELS, NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and NORTHERN NEVADA CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Michael Lujan v. NDOC, et al
as 21-16418
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL VINCENT LUJAN
Respondent / Appellee:
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, NORTHERN NEVADA CORRECTIONAL CENTER and CHARLES DANIELS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
