Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Mirror Finish PDR, LLC et al v. Cosmetic Car Company Holdings, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00440
Plaintiff:
Huff Wesley and Mirror Finish PDR, LLC
Defendant:
Eric Stokes, Cosmetic Car Company Holdings, Inc., Cosmetic Car Company, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Daniel et al v. Auxilium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
as 1:2015cv06899
Plaintiff:
Charles Daniel and Janet Daniel
Defendant:
Auxilium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Daniels v. Sanky et al
as 1:2014cv02547
Plaintiff:
Charles Daniels
Defendant:
Katherine Sanky and Theresa Olson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniels v. Cook County Sheriff Department et al
as 1:2014cv01533
Plaintiff:
Charles Daniels
Defendant:
Cook County Sheriff Department and Rivers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniels v. Chevlin et al
as 1:2013cv04149
Plaintiff:
Charles Daniels
Defendant:
Lorna Amalda-Chevlin, B. J. Park and Office of Emergency Mgmt. Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. Ting et al
as 1:2013cv03112
Plaintiff:
Charles Daniels
Defendant:
Andrew Ting, Sheriff Balderamo, Sheriff Capers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels vs. Mohammed Mansour, et al
as 1:2011cv08346
Plaintiff:
Charles Daniels
Defendant:
Mohammed Mansour , Manisha Patel , Supt. Nursing Pavarenti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00021
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101 Bankruptcy
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00850
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
Daniels v. Austin
as 1:2007cv06475
Plaintiff:
Charles Daniels
Defendant:
Dan Austin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
