Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Yang v. Derosa
as 2:2009cv02578
Plaintiff:
Teng Yang
Defendant:
Charles DeRosa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Yang v. Derosa
as 4:2009cv03374
Plaintiff:
Teng Yang
Defendant:
Charles Derosa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anthony Carrasco v. Charles DeRosa
as 2:2009cv03321
Petitioner:
Anthony Carrasco
Respondent:
Charles DeRosa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Soto-Angulo v. DeRosa
as 1:2007cv01566
Petitioner:
Roberto Quinto Soto-Angulo
Respondent:
Charles DeRosa, Charles DeRosa and Charles DeRosa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Campos v. DeRosa
as 1:2007cv01537
Petitioner:
Augustine Ramos Campos
Respondent:
Charles DeRosa, Charles DeRosa and Charles DeRosa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Toledo-Celedon v. DeRosa
as 1:2007cv01402
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Toledo-Celedon
Defendant:
Charles DeRosa and Charles DeRosa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Augustine Ramos Campos v. Charles DeRosa
as 2:2007cv05592
Petitioner:
Augustine Ramos Campos
Respondent:
Charles DeRosa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Mario A Chicas Medina v. Charles DeRosa
as 2:2007cv05582
Petitioner:
Mario A Chicas Medina
Respondent:
Charles DeRosa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hernandez v. United States of America, et al.
as 1:2007cv01208
Petitioner:
Andres Rincon Hernandez
Respondent:
United States of America and Charles DeRosa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Edmund Prescott v. DeRosa
as 1:2007cv01138
Petitioner:
Edmund Prescott
Respondent:
Charles DeRosa, Charles DeRosa and Charles DeRosa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
