Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Charles Breland, Jr. v. Commissioner of IRS
as 23-12345
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHARLES K. BRELAND, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF IRS
Charles Breland, Jr. v. USA
as 19-14321
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and LEVADA EF FIVE, LLC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES K. BRELAND, JR.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00117
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00312
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00268
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Transmission of Bankruptcy Reference
Charles Breland, Jr., et al v. Levada EF Five, LLC
as 16-14709
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES K. BRELAND, JR., OSPREY UTAH, LLC, WATER CANYON HOLDINGS, LLC and others
Defendant - Appellee:
LEVADA EF FIVE, LLC
:
SERVICE
Breland et al v. Utah Reverse Exchange, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv00023
Plaintiff:
Charles K. Breland, Jr. , Osprey Utah, LLC , Water Canyon Holdings, LLC and others
Defendant:
Levada EF Five, LLC, Adrian Zajac and Argos Investment Partners, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Breland et al v. Levada EF Five, LLC
as 3:2015cv00385
Plaintiff:
Charles K. Breland, Jr., Osprey Utah, LLC, Range Creek Holdings, LLC and others
Defendant:
Levada EF Five, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Breland et al v. Levada EF Five, LLC
as 3:2015mc00050
Plaintiff:
Charles K. Breland, Jr., Osprey Utah, LLC, Range Creek Holdings, LLC and others
In The Matter Of:
Linda Donado and William Donado
Defendant:
Levada EF Five, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Breland v. Levada EF Five LLC
as 2:2015mc00851
Plaintiff:
Charles K Breland
Defendant:
Levada EF Five LLC
Movant:
Louis W. Breland
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
