Cases 11 - 20 of 53
Brahim v Mukasey et al
as 6:2009cv06258
Petitioner:
Ada Brahim
Respondent:
Micheal Mukasey, Micheal Chertoff, Charles Mule and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hilaire v. Holder et al
as 6:2009cv06173
Petitioner:
Joseph Hilaire
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Michael Chertoff, Charles Mule and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Bents v. Holder et al
as 1:2009cv00297
Petitioner:
Celestin Bents
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Micheal Chertoff, Charles Mule' and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Curtis v. Holder et al
as 1:2009cv00206
Petitioner:
Henry George Curtis
Respondent:
Eric Holder, Janet Napolitano, Charles Mule and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Hakeem v. Mukasey et al
as 6:2009cv06072
Petitioner:
Oumar Hakeem
Respondent:
Michael Mukasey, Micheal Chertoff, Charles Mule and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Diallo v. Mukasey et al
as 6:2009cv06055
Petitioner:
Ahmed Diallo
Respondent:
Micheal Mukasey, Micheal Chertoff, Charles Mule' and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Islam v. Mukasey et al
as 1:2009cv00087
Petitioner:
Mohammed Zahedul Islam
Respondent:
Micheal Mukasey, Micheal Chertoff, Charles Mule' and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jacobus v. Mukasey et al
as 1:2009cv00057
Petitioner:
Nathan Jacobus
Respondent:
Micheal Mukasey, Micheal Chertoff, Charles Mule' and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Beteta-Pena v. Mukasey et al
as 1:2008cv00958
Petitioner:
Efrain Beteta-Pena
Respondent:
Michael Mukasey, Michael Chertoff, Charles Mule' and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Najib v. Chertoff et al
as 6:2008cv06456
Petitioner:
Tabet Najib
Respondent:
Micheal Chertoff, James Hayes, Jr., Michael Mukasey and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
