Cases 21 - 30 of 53
Diakite v. Heron et al
as 1:2008cv00677
Petitioner:
Abdoulaye Diakite
Respondent:
Martin Heron, Charles Mule and Michael Mukasey
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Stapleton v. Ridge et al
as 6:2008cv06348
Petitioner:
Floyel Stapleton
Respondent:
Tom Ridge, James Hayes, Jr., Michael Mukasey and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Masoud v. Mukasey et al
as 6:2008cv06345
Petitioner:
Suleiman Mohammed Masoud
Respondent:
Micheal Mukasey, Micheal Chertoff, Charles Mule and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Gordon v. Herron et al
as 1:2008cv00508
Petitioner:
Troy Anthony Francis Gordon
Respondent:
Martin Herron, Charles Mule, Julie L. Myers and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Alexis v. Mukasey et al
as 1:2008cv06032
Petitioner:
Bayne W. Alexis
Respondent:
Michael B. Mukasey, Michael Chertoff, Charles Mule and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Machado v. Heron et al
as 1:2008cv00390
Petitioner:
Carlos Machado
Respondent:
Martin Heron, Charles Mule and Michael Mukasey
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Ramos v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2007cv00858
Petitioner:
Pedro Ramos
Respondent:
Michael Chertoff, William Cleary, Michael B. Mukasey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Getten v. Gonzales et al
as 6:2007cv06477
Petitioner:
Voitell Getten
Respondent:
Alberto R. Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, William Cleary and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Arthur v. Gonzales et al
as 6:2007cv06473
Plaintiff:
Alberto Arthur
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, William Cleary and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Michael v. Mule et al
as 6:2007cv06440
Petitioner:
Zimran Michael
Defendant:
Charles Mule, David Venturella, William Cleary and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
