Cases 1 - 10 of 38
TORRES v. JOHN DOE 1-3
as 1:2024cv04897
Plaintiff:
CHARLES P. TORRES
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1-3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUGGINS et al v. SANDILOS et al
as 1:2022cv01226
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HUGGINS, BRUCE HOUGH, LUIS VAZQUEZ and others
Defendant:
DEPUTY P.D. CHARLES P. SANDILOS, ASST. DEPUTY P.D. KIMBERLY SCHULTZ, OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDERS CUMBERLAND COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SIMS et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2021cv01120
Defendant:
UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, CHARLES P. RETTIG, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff:
MARCIA BROWN and SHERRY L SIMS
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
CHADWELL v. RETTIG
as 3:2020cv09008
Plaintiff:
STEELE R. CHADWELL
Defendant:
CHARLES P. RETTIG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 7402
JMM HOLLIS ROAD FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP v. CHARLES P. RETTIG
as 3:2020cv01273
Defendant:
CHARLES P. RETTIG, COMMISSIONER OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and CHARLES P. RETTIG
Plaintiff:
JMM HOLLIS ROAD FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7426
UNITED PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. BROYLES et al
as 3:2019cv18950
Defendant:
ROBERT C FISCHER, J MICHAEL BROYLES, JAMES COTUGNO and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
SCOTT v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2019cv09646
Plaintiff:
CHARLES P SCOTT
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA LP, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP and MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FRATIS v. PHH CORPORATION et al
as 1:2018cv09674
Plaintiff:
TAMI FRATIS
Defendant:
PHH CORPORATION, JAMES O. EGAN, JANE D. CARLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
FRANCHI v. PHH CORPORATION et al
as 2:2018cv09006
Plaintiff:
ADAM FRANCHI
Defendant:
PHH CORPORATION, JANE D. CARLIN, ROBERT B. CROWL and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
