Cases 1 - 6 of 6
IMO 2020 Attorney Mass Suspension
as 3:2020mc00017
In Re:
Mark Arnold Werling, John Christopher Havill, Steven Stoy Crone and others
INDIANA STATE COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS PENSION FUND et al v. QUEEN CITY ACOUSTICAL, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv00192
Plaintiff:
UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERS APPRENTICESHIP TRAINING FUND OF NORTH AMERICA, INDIANA/KENTUCKY/OHIO REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS APPRENTICESHIP AND TRAINING FUND, INDIANA/KENTUCKY/OHIO REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS and others
Defendant:
QUEEN CITY ACOUSTICAL, INC. and Charles Richard Weber
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
INDIANA STATE COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS PENSION FUND et al v. QUEEN CITY ACOUSTICAL, INC., et al
as 1:2016cv02912
Plaintiff:
INDIANA STATE COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS PENSION FUND, INDIANA/KENTUCKY/OHIO REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS, INDIANA/KENTUCKY/OHIO REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS APPRENTICESHIP AND TRAINING FUND and others
Defendant:
QUEEN CITY ACOUSTICAL. INC. and CHARLES RICHARD WEBER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
INDIANA STATE COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS PENSION FUND et al v. QUEEN CITY ACOUSTICAL INC., et al
as 1:2016cv01357
Plaintiff:
INDIANA STATE COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS PENSION FUND, INDIANA/KENTUCKY/OHIO REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS, INDIANA/KENTUCKY/OHIO REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS APPRENTICESHIP AND TRAINING FUND and others
Defendant:
QUEEN CITY ACOUSTICAL, INC. and CHARLES RICHARD WEBER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Gilbert v. Ledoux
as 3:2014cv01714
Plaintiff:
Charles Richard Alsop Gilbert, Jr
Defendant:
Judyth A Ledoux, US Attorney and US Attorney General-Dept of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2009mc00077
In Re:
IN THE MATTER OF FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS AND/OR NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES
Respondent:
DAWN DESIREE CUMMINGS, FAZIA DEEN-BACCHUS, LISA MARIE DIRIG and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
