Cases 1 - 4 of 4
United States of America v. 14019 Emma Way Cove Drive, Gonzales, Louisiana 70737
as 3:2023cv00555
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
In Re: 14019 Emma Way Cove Drive, Gonzales, Louisiana 70737, 14019 Emma Way Cove Drive, Gonzales, Louisiana 70737, $61,576.99 from Navy Federal Credit Union Account Number XXXXXX8007 and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property - Real Estate
United States of America v. $277,872.39 from Pelican State Credit Union Account Number XXX007 in the Name of Elliott Sterling et al
as 3:2021cv00700
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
IN RE: $277,872.39 FROM PELICAN STATE CREDIT UNION ACCOUNT NUMBER XXX007 IN THE NAME OF ELLIOTT STERLING; $130,000.00 FROM JP MORGAN CHASE BANK RELATED TO JP MORGAN CHASE BANK CASHIERS CHECK, $277,872.39 From Pelican State Credit Union Account Number XXX007 in the Name of Elliott Sterling and $130,000.00 from JP Morgan Chase Bank Related to JP Morgan Chase Bank Cashier
Not Classified By Court:
Elliott Sterling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341
United States of America v. One Hundred Seventy-Nine Thousand Dollars in U.S. Currency in JPMorgan Chase Bank Safe Deposit Bank in the Name of Travis James
as 3:2018cv00664
Defendant:
One Hundred Seventy-Nine Thousand Dollars in U.S. Currency in JPMorgan Chase Bank Safe Deposit Bank in the Name of Travis James
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. Three Hundred Sixty Thousand Dollars ($360,000.00), et al
as 3:2011cv00703
Defendant:
Three Hundred Sixty Thousand Dollars ($360,000.00) Currently Deposited AFTRAK No. 72070003-01, Seized From A JP Morgan Chase Bank Account of Wilkerson Tax Service, and One Hundred Ten Thousand Do
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341 Complaint for Forfeiture
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
