Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00678
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 no Job Discrimination (National Origin)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00899
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1412 - IDEA: State Eligibility
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00874
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 - IDEA: Challenge Decision re: Education for Handicapped
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00503
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02621
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02326
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
D.T. v. Cherry Creek School
as 21-1265
Plaintiff / Appellant: D.T., a minor, by and through his parent Yasiris T.
Defendant / Appellee: CHERRY CREEK SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 5
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv01054
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794
C1.G v. Siegfried, et al
as 20-1320
Defendant / Appellee: BRYNN THOMAS, Dean at Cherry Creek High School, CHERRY CREEK SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 5, SCOTT SIEGFRIED, Superintendent of Cherry Creek School District and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: C1.G, on behalf of his minor son, C.G., the aggrieved party
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01690
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?