Cases 1 - 10 of 273
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03487
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Dial v. Dichter et al
as 1:2024cv02648
Plaintiff:
Keith Dial
Defendant:
Kenneth Dichter, Todd Smith, David Adelman and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02477
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01423
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00430
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Doe v. Sigma Chi International Fraternity, Incorporated et al
as 5:2023cv01452
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Sigma Chi International Fraternity, Incorporated, Luke Rogers, Ethan Hirsh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Lang v. Dichter et al
as 1:2023cv08316
Plaintiff:
Jesse A. Lang
Defendant:
Kenneth Dichter, Todd Smith, George Mattson and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv07877
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Cheung v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv08899
Plaintiff:
Chi How Cheung
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Uber USA, LLC and Rasier-NY LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pi Diversity-Personal Injury
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al v. ENS Medical, P.C. et al
as 1:2023cv06937
Plaintiff:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Defendant:
ENS Medical, P.C., Atlantic Medical Care, P.C., Northern Medical Care, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
