Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Inslee v. Kalanthroff et al
as 2:2022cv04227
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Inslee
Defendant:
Detective Randy Kalanthroff, Detective/Sergeant Avis, Sergeant Patrick C. Oneill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Louis v. United Nations et al
as 1:2018cv12065
Plaintiff:
Joe W.J. Louis
Defendant:
Security Council, Kim Jung, Irans Leader and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jean-Louis v. Trump et al
as 1:2018cv02692
Plaintiff:
Joe W. Jean-Louis
Defendant:
Trump, Putkin, Assad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blast v. Lewalski et al
as 1:2017cv01053
Plaintiff:
Synthia-China Blast
Defendant:
Timothy Lewalski , John Barbera and Robert Kyle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blast v. Griffin et al
as 1:2015cv01558
Plaintiff:
Synthia-China Blast
Defendant:
Patrick J. Griffin, Jason D. Effman, Deputy Inspector General of the Sex Crimes Unit for ("DOCCS") and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garrett v. State of Florida et al
as 1:2014cv03686
Defendant:
Attorney General, Counsel Activist Box 70447, Counsel National Box 1910 and others
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Synthia China Blast v. Herbert et al
as 1:2010cv07639
Petitioner:
Synthia China Blast
Respondent:
Victor T. Herbert and Robert Kirkpatrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kelly v. China et al
as 1:2010cv06136
Plaintiff:
Anthony B. Kelly
Defendant:
A.V. China, Abraham, (Polite) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelly v. Mr. China A on V et al
as 1:2010cv05361
Plaintiff:
Anthony B. Kelly
Defendant:
Mr. China A on V, Mr. Polite Correction Officer at O.B.C.C., Mr. Williams Correction Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Giddens v. Schriro et al
as 1:2009cv10330
Plaintiff:
Ronald Giddens
Defendant:
Dora Schriro, Juan Quinones, Pittman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
