Cases 1 - 6 of 6
One Step Up, Ltd. v. Tianjin Ztyf International Trade Co., Ltd. et al
as 1:2018cv12308
Defendant:
China Export & Credit Insurance Corporation a/k/a Sinosure, Tianjin Ztyf International Trade Co., Ltd., Larry Zhu and others
Plaintiff:
One Step Up, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc
King Zak Industries, Inc. v. Paramont Global Ltd. et al
as 7:2017cv00449
Plaintiff:
King Zak Industries, Inc.
Defendant:
Paramont Global Ltd., Wevel LLC, Ningbo Evergreat Import and Export Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
China Export & Credit Corporation v. Carlisle Transportation Products, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00846
Defendant:
Carlisle Transportation Products, Inc. , Carlisle Companies, Inc. , Carlisle Fluid Technologies, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
China Export & Credit Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rapid Rack Industries, Inc. v. China Export Credit Insurance, et al
as 13-56904
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAPID RACK INDUSTRIES, INC., a California corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
CHINA EXPORT CREDIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, a Chinese corporation and ZHEJIAN JIAXING ZHONG DA GROUP CO., LTD., a Chinese corporation
PNY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. ELITEGROUP COMPUTER SYSTEMS CO., LTD. et al
as 2:2013cv02162
Plaintiff:
PNY TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Defendant:
ELITEGROUP COMPUTER SYSTEMS CO., LTD. and CHINA EXPORT & CREDIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
CHINA EXPORT & CREDIT INSURANCE CORPORATION et al v. GLOBAL TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv04051
Plaintiff:
CHINA EXPORT & CREDIT INSURANCE CORPORATION and ANHUI TECHNOLOGY IMPORT AND EXPORT CO., LTD.
Defendant:
GLOBAL TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC., GLOBAL CONTAINER LINE, INC., MJT IMPORTS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
