Cases 11 - 15 of 15
China Pacific Property Insurance Co., Ltd. v. Alto Container Line, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv04034
Plaintiff:
China Pacific Property Insurance Co., Ltd.
Defendant:
Alto Container Line, Inc., Alto Systems, Inc., Amass International Group Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
China Pacific Property Insurance Co., Ltd. v. MV JIA XING et al
as 4:2011cv04634
Plaintiff:
China Pacific Property Insurance Co., Ltd.
Defendant:
MV JIA XING, Yongxing Maritime Co. Ltd. and ChinesePolish Joint Stock Shipping Company
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1300
SDB Trade International, L.P. et al v. Daebo Shipping Co., Ltd. et al
as 4:2009cv03502
Plaintiff:
SDB Trade International, L.P. and China Pacific Property Insurance Co., Ltd.
Defendant:
Daebo Shipping Co., Ltd. and Richway Cartage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1300 Carriage of Goods by Sea Act
China Pacific Property Insurance Co Ltd v. Clark Freight Lines Inc et al
as 2:2007cv00177
Plaintiff:
China Pacific Property Insurance Co Ltd
Defendant:
Clark Freight Lines Inc, Sea Trade International Inc, Cosco Container Lines Americas Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
China Pacific Property Insurance Co Ltd v. Sea Trade International Inc et al
as 2:2007cv00110
Plaintiff:
China Pacific Property Insurance Co Ltd
Defendant:
Sea Trade International Inc, Sea Trade International Inc, Clark Freight Lines Inc and others
Cross Claimant:
Sea Trade International Inc
Cross Defendant:
Roes 1-25, inclusive and Clark Freight Lines Inc
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
Sea Trade International Inc
ThirdParty Defendant:
Cosco Container Lines Americas Inc, Cosco Logistics, Inc, Intermodal Bridge Transport Inc and others
Counter Claimant:
Cosco Container Lines Americas Inc and Intermodal Bridge Transport Inc
Counter Defendant:
Clark Freight Lines Inc
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 11702 (a)(4) Violations of Interstate Commerce Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
