Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Railey v. Crow
as 1:2024cv01364
Petitioner:
Bret G. Railey
Unknown:
Habeas Attorney General
Respondent:
Christel Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Railey v. Crow
as 3:2024cv02244
Respondent:
Christel Crow
Petitioner:
Bret G. Railey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adamczyk v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv01689
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Illinois Department of Corrections and Christel Crow
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Adamczyk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coultas v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv01650
Plaintiff:
John Coultas
Defendant:
J. Saddler, Clayton Stephenson, Latoya Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adamczyk v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv03178
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Adamczyk
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, LaToya Hughes and Christel Crow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvarado-Gonzalez v. Kimberly et al
as 3:2024cv01371
Defendant:
Sgt Belford, Placement Office, Warden Kimberly and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Alvarado-Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baldwin v. Crow et al
as 1:2024cv03626
Petitioner:
Derrick Anthony Angelos Baldwin
Respondent:
Christel Crow, Kimberly Hvarre and Attorney General of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Zepeda v. Wexford Health Care Source, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00818
Plaintiff:
Francisco Zepeda
Defendant:
Wexford Health Care Source, Inc., Christine Brown and Christel Crow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Crow et al
as 1:2024cv01097
Petitioner:
Giovann Jones
Respondent:
Christel Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Willie Harrison v. Christel Crow
as 24-1097
Applicant:
WILLIE J. HARRISON
Respondent:
CHRISTEL CROW, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
