Cases 1 - 6 of 6
CHRISTENSON v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv08347
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE CHRISTENSON
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES & PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SHAF INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. NORTH AMERICAN FLY, LTD. et al
as 2:2022cv00059
Plaintiff:
SHAF INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Defendant:
NORTH AMERICAN FLY, LTD. and LELAND G CHRISTENSON II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
CHRISTENSON v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2021cv16316
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
PATTY CHRISTENSON
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Feher et al v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv13451
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES INC. and others
Plaintiff:
Barbara Feher, JOSE GOMEZ, Trinidad Acosta and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FRAZIER INDUSTRIAL COMPANY v. FROZEN ASSETS COLD STORAGE, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv05545
Defendant:
Avtech Capital LLC, Frozen Assets Cold Storage, LLC, Samuel Love and others
Plaintiff:
FRAZIER INDUSTRIAL COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CHRISTENSON v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. et al
as 3:2018cv12357
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. and IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC.
Plaintiff:
JEAN CHRISTENSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
