Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Christina Paylan v. Khalil Abdo
as 19-14206
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTINA PAYLAN
Defendant / Appellee:
KHALIL ABDO
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv01146
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Christina Paylan v. Comaneci Devage, et al
as 19-10859
Defendant / Appellee:
COMANECI DEVAGE, individual and official capacity, DOES, MARK DETRIO and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTINA PAYLAN
Other:
SERVICE
Christina Paylan v. Darrell Dirks, et al
as 18-12971
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTINA PAYLAN, Dr.
Defendant - Appellee:
DARRELL DIRKS, CHRISTINE BROWN, BRIAN BISHOP and others
Christina Paylan v. Attorney General, State of Fl., et al
as 18-12529
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTINA PAYLAN, M.D.
Defendant - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, individual capacity, MARK OBER, individual capacity, DARRELL DIRKS, individual capacity and others
Christina Paylan v. Scott Teitelbaum, et al
as 18-10886
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTINA PAYLAN, MD
Defendant - Appellee:
SCOTT TEITELBAUM, M.D. in his individual and official capacities and UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA BOARD OF TRUSTEES
:
SERVICE
Paylan v. Dirks et al
as 8:2018cv00494
Plaintiff:
Christina Paylan
Defendant:
Darrell Dirks , Christine Brown , Brian Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christina Paylan v. Bondi, et al
as 17-13570
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTINA PAYLAN, M.D.
Defendant - Appellee:
PAMELA JO BONDI, MARK OBER, DARRELL DIRKS and others
Christina Paylan v. Scott Teitelbaum, et al
as 17-12960
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTINA PAYLAN, MD
Defendant - Appellee:
SCOTT TEITELBAUM, MD in his individual and official capacities and UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA BOARD OF TRUSTEES, A State-Operated Entity
:
SERVICE
In re: Christina Paylan
as 17-12922
Petitioner:
In re: CHRISTINA PAYLAN
Mandamus Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
