Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Carbin (DO NOT FILE) v. Tate County Board of Supervisors et al
as 3:2023cv00206
Petitioner:
Christopher Carbin (DO NOT FILE)
Respondent:
Tate County Board of Supervisors and Judge George C. Carlson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carbin (DO NOT FILE) v. Outlaw et al
as 3:2018cv00067
Plaintiff:
Christopher Carbin (DO NOT FILE)
Defendant:
Timothy Outlaw, MTC Management Training Corporation, Albridge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carbin (DO NOT FILE) v. King et al
as 2:2011mc00004
Petitioner:
Christopher Carbin (DO NOT FILE)
Respondent:
Ronald King and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Carbin (DO NOT FILE) v. King et al
as 2:2011cv00208
Petitioner:
Christopher Carbin (DO NOT FILE)
Respondent:
Ronald King and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Carbin (DO NOT FILE) v. Ingram et al
as 2:2010mc00003
Plaintiff:
Christopher Carbin (DO NOT FILE)
Defendant:
Ingram, Emmette Hale, James Sowell and others
Carbin (DO NOT FILE) v. Ingram
as 2:2010mc00002
Plaintiff:
Christopher Carbin (DO NOT FILE)
Defendant:
Ingram
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00240
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Carbin (DO NOT FILE) v. Epps, et al
as 2:2007cv00229
Petitioner:
Christopher Carbin (DO NOT FILE)
Respondent:
Christopher Epps and Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carbin (DO NOT FILE) v. Kelly et al
as 2:2007cv00054
Petitioner:
Christopher Carbin (DO NOT FILE)
Respondent:
Lawrence Kelly and Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carbin (DO NOT FILE) v. Diaz
as 2:2007mc00001
Defendant:
Oliver E. Diaz
Plaintiff:
Christopher Carbin (DO NOT FILE)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
