Cases 41 - 50 of 197
Williams v. Epps et al
as 4:2013cv00091
Plaintiff:
Bennie L. Williams
Defendant:
Christopher Epps and Emmitt L. Sparkman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Epps et al
as 1:2013cv00094
Plaintiff:
Richard Moore
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Mississippi Department of Corrections, Brand Huffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wall v. Epps et al
as 3:2013cv00077
Petitioner:
Jerome Wall
Respondent:
Christopher Epps and E. L. Sparkman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Andrews v. Davenport et al
as 4:2013cv00043
Plaintiff:
Kolby Andrews
Defendant:
Davenport, Rogers, Ron Reagon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. Epps et al
as 1:2013cv00044
Petitioner:
Michael Shane Richardson
Respondent:
Christopher Epps and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dobbs v. Epps et al
as 4:2013cv00029
Plaintiff:
Carl Dobbs
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Emmitt L. Sparkman, Earnest Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shannon v. Epps et al
as 1:2013cv00035
Petitioner:
James M. Shannon
Respondent:
Christopher Epps and Attorney General for the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grose v. Epps et al
as 3:2013cv00047
Petitioner:
Johnny Grose
Respondent:
Christopher Epps and Earnest Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Epps et al
as 4:2013cv00010
Plaintiff:
Charles Smith
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, E. L. Sparkman and Earnest Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henry v. Epps et al
as 4:2013cv00005
Petitioner:
Willie Lewis Henry, Jr.
Respondent:
Christopher Epps, Emmitt Sparkman, Ernest Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
