Cases 21 - 30 of 58
Davis v. Epps
as 4:2011cv00058
Petitioner:
Melvin Lee Davis
Respondent:
Christopher Epps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dukes v. Epps
as 2:2011cv00091
Petitioner:
Travis Dukes
Respondent:
Christopher Epps and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wilson v. Epps et al
as 2:2010cv00196
Petitioner:
Christopher Wilson
Respondent:
Christopher Epps and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Epps et al
as 2:2010cv00171
Petitioner:
Isaiah Williams
Respondent:
Christopher Epps and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hughes v. Epps et al
as 1:2009cv00284
Petitioner:
Yasmin Hughes
Respondent:
Christopher Epps and Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Epps et al
as 4:2009cv00120
Petitioner:
Stephen Harris
Respondent:
Christopher Epps, Dale Caskey and The Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burrough v. Horton et al
as 4:2009cv00117
Petitioner:
Christopher Jason Burrough
Respondent:
Rayford Horton, Christopher Epps and The Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perry v. Epps et al
as 1:2009cv00214
Petitioner:
Timothy Edward Perry
Respondent:
Christopher Epps and Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Trice v. Epps et al
as 1:2009cv00154
Petitioner:
Michael Trice
Respondent:
Christopher Epps, Shannon Warnock and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Epps et al
as 1:2009cv00124
Petitioner:
Christopher Harris
Defendant:
Christopher Epps and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
