Cases 31 - 40 of 201
Crook v. Epps et al
as 2:2013cv00188
Plaintiff:
Wilbert Crook
Defendant:
Christopher Epps and Hubert Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wansley v. State of Mississipip
as 3:2013cv00517
Plaintiff:
Thomas Calvin Wansley
Respondent:
Christopher Epps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Boyd v. State of Mississippi et al
as 1:2013cv00147
Petitioner:
Terence One Boyd
Respondent:
State of Mississippi, Christopher Epps and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Turner v. Mississippi
as 5:2013cv00107
Plaintiff:
Cora Ann Turner
Respondent:
Christopher Epps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Epps et al
as 1:2013cv00130
Petitioner:
Richard Moore
Respondent:
Christopher Epps and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bass v. State of Mississippi
as 4:2013cv00092
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Bass
Respondent:
Christopher Epps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Torns v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2013cv00264
Plaintiff:
Romain Shontay Torns
Defendant:
State of Mississippi , Parole Board Chairmain, Board Members and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
States v. Epps
as 3:2013cv00226
Plaintiff:
Shawn M. States
Defendant:
Christopher Epps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ingram v. State of Mississippi
as 4:2013cv00062
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ray Ingram
Defendant:
Christopher Epps and Johnny Crockett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wall v. Epps et al
as 3:2013cv00077
Petitioner:
Jerome Wall
Respondent:
Christopher Epps and E. L. Sparkman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
