Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Fitzgerald Spivey v. Miami Federal Correction Institution
as 1:2026cv25602
Plaintiff:
Christopher Fitzgerald Spivey, Jr.
Defendant:
Miami Federal Correction Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Fail Forward Enterprise Holdings LLC v. Miller et al
as 1:2026cv01981
Plaintiff:
Fail Forward Enterprise Holdings LLC
Defendant:
Christopher Fitzgerald Miller Individually doing business as Eleven 11 Recovery LLC and Diana Acosta-Miller Individually and as a conduit for funds moved through Eleven 11 Recovery LLC doing business as Cloud Brigade/Launch Brigade
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Civil Remedies: Racketeering (RICO) Act
In re: Christopher Jones
as 25-14551
Petitioner:
In re: CHRISTOPHER FITZGERALD JONES
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: Christopher Jones
as 25-14504
Petitioner:
In re: CHRISTOPHER FITZGERALD JONES
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Christopher Spivey, Jr.
as 25-12867
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER FITZGERALD SPIVEY, JR.
Jones v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00211
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Christopher Fitzgerald Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
FITZGERALD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv30167
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER FITZGERALD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Christopher Jones
as 23-12028
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER FITZGERALD JONES
Hutchinson v. Mimecast Limited et al
as 1:2022cv00665
Plaintiff:
Nathalie Hutchinson
Defendant:
Mimecast Limited, Peter Bauer, Aron Ain and others
Smith v. Mimecast Limited et al
as 1:2022cv00630
Plaintiff:
Tom Smith
Defendant:
Mimecast Limited, Peter Bauer, Aron Ain and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
