Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 38
Pierce (ID 58077) v. Waddington et al
as 5:2015cv03018
Petitioner: Christopher Pierce
Respondent: Douglas Waddington and Kansas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pierce (ID 58077) v. Waddington et al
as 5:2015cv03002
Petitioner: Christopher Pierce
Respondent: Douglas Waddington and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pierce (ID 58077) v. Waddington et al
as 5:2014cv03223
Petitioner: Christopher Pierce
Respondent: Douglas Waddington and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pierce v. Waddington et al
as 5:2014cv03173
Petitioner: Christopher Pierce
Respondent: Douglas Waddington and Attorney General of the State of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pierce (ID 58077) v. Waddington et al
as 5:2014cv03098
Petitioner: Christopher Pierce
Respondent: Douglas Waddington and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pierce (ID 58077) v. Waddington et al
as 5:2013cv03204
Petitioner: Christopher Pierce
Respondent: Douglas Waddington and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pierce v. Waddington et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2013cv03160
Petitioner: Christopher Pierce
Respondent: Douglas Waddington and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pierce (ID 58077) v. Waddington et al
as 5:2013cv03108
Petitioner: Christopher Pierce
Respondent: Douglas Waddington and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pierce v. Rohling
as 5:2009cv03183
Petitioner: Christopher Pierce
Respondent: Karen Rohling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pierce v. Rohling
as 09-3144
Petitioner - Appellant: CHRISTOPHER PIERCE
Respondent - Appellee: KAREN ROHLINGS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?