Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Desmond et al v. May et al
as 1:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
Christopher R. Desmond and Jose Moreta
Defendant:
Robert May, Jason Schaffer, Andrew Peruchi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christopher DesmondIn re: Christopher Desmond
as 20-1842
Petitioner:
In re: CHRISTOPHER R. DESMOND
Respondent:
JOHN CARNEY, LEONARD P. STARK and STATE OF DELAWARE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00420
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Desmond v. Klopp et al
as 1:2020cv00135
Defendant:
Justin Atherholt, John Doe, Michael Stafford and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher R. Desmond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Desmond v. State Of Delaware
as 1:2020cv00046
Respondent:
State Of Delaware
Petitioner:
Christopher R. Desmond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Desmond v. Connections Medical Services et al
as 1:2018cv01828
Respondent:
Warden Dana Metzger, Attorney General Matthew Denn and Connections Medical Services
Petitioner:
Christopher R. Desmond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
State of Delaware v. Desmond
as 1:2018cv01283
Defendant:
Christopher R. Desmond
Plaintiff:
State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Desmond v. Phelps et al
as 1:2017cv00218
Petitioner:
Christopher R. Desmond
Respondent:
Perry Phelps, Delaware Department of Corrections, James T. Vaughn Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christopher Desmond v. Warden James T Vaughn Correcti, et al
as 16-3614
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER R. DESMOND
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER and ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE
Christopher Desmond v. Warden James T Vaughn Correcti, et al
as 15-3248
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER R. DESMOND
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER and ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
