Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Emery v. Gitness et al
as 2:2023cv01958
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Emery, Jr.
Defendant:
Gabriell Gitness, Christy Hutson, Elizabeth Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Emery, Jr. v. Michael Gower, et al
as 21-35283
Defendant / Appellee:
SAN JUANITA ROSALES, BHS Manager, TRCI, in their individual and official capacities, M. VENTURA, Statewide ADA Coordinator, ODOC, in their individual and official capacities, M. PERRY, Acting Assistant Superintendent Corrections, in their individual and official capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT LEE EMERY, Jr.
Emery v. Gower et al
as 2:2020cv01691
Defendant:
S. Martin, Ms. Isles, Ms. L. Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Emery, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Emery v. Nooth et al
as 2:2019cv01070
Defendant:
Lt. R. A. Young, M. Andrews, A. Houston and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Emery, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sir Giorgio Clardy, et al v. Todd Byerly, et al
as 19-35419
Defendant / Appellee:
GABRIELL GITNES, DANIELLE FUZI, COLETTE S. PETERS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SIR GIORGIO SANFORD CLARDY
Plaintiff:
UNNAMED O.D.O.C. PRISONERS
Gardner v. Hutson et al
as 2:2019cv00262
Defendant:
John and Jane Does, B. Clark, Christy Hutson and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Carl Robert Gardner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Clardy et al v. Byerly et al
as 6:2018cv01200
Defendant:
Todd Byerly, Danielle Fuzi, Jane Jung and others
Plaintiff:
Unnamed O.D.O.C. Prisoners and Sir Giorgio Sanford Clardy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sirgiorgio Clardy v. Greg Jones, et al
as 18-35006
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SIRGIORGIO SANFORD CLARDY
Defendant - Appellee:
GREG JONES, COLETTE PETERS, MICHAEL F. GOWER and others
Clardy v. Jones et al
as 2:2017cv00178
Defendant:
Richard Adams, Matthew Barba, Jason Bell and others
Plaintiff:
Sir Giorgio Sanford Clardy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
