Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Gurnani v. United States Department of the Interior, et al.
as 1:2023cv01293
Plaintiff:
Ramesh Gurnani an individual Doing business as Crossroads Tours
Defendant:
United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service and Cicely Muldoon
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Earth Island Institute v. Cicely Muldoon, et al
as 22-16483
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EARTH ISLAND INSTITUTE, a non-profit corporation
Defendant / Appellee:
CICELY MULDOON, in her official capacity as Superintendent of Yosemite National Park, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and UNITED STATES NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, an agency of the United States Department of the Interior
Earth Island Institute v. Muldoon et al
as 1:2022cv00710
Plaintiff:
Earth Island Institute
Defendant:
Cicely Muldoon, United States Department of the Interior and United States National Park Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
San Francisco Herring Assoc. v. USDOI, et al
as 20-17412
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, CICELY MULDOON, in her official capacity as General Superintendent of the Golden Gate National Recreation Area and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAN FRANCISCO HERRING ASSOCIATION
Resource Renewal Institute, et al v. National Park Service, et al
as 16-17027
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RESOURCE RENEWAL INSTITUTE, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT
Defendant:
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE and CICELY MULDOON, in her official capacity as Superintendent of Point Reyes National Seashore
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellant:
KEVIN LUNNY, NANCY LUNNY, RICHARD GROSSI and others
Resource Renewal Institute et al v. National Park Service et al
as 3:2016cv00688
Plaintiff:
Resource Renewal Institute , Center for Biological Diversity and Western Watersheds Project
Defendant:
National Park Service and Cicely Muldoon
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
