Cases 1 - 10 of 643
Carroll v. Citibank N.A.
as 1:2024cv00788
Plaintiff:
Robert B. Carroll Individually doing business as Medisys
Defendant:
Citibank N.A. doing business as Citi doing business as Citigroup, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Feraru v. Citibank N.A.
as 1:2024cv04542
Plaintiff:
Victor M Feraru dba Law Office of Victor M. Feraru
Defendant:
Citibank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 t Diversity-Torts
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04423
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv04436
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Braun v. Citibank, N.A.
as 1:2024cv03832
Plaintiff:
Erwin Braun
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Genesis Management Resources Corp. v. Citibank, N.A.
as 2:2024cv02559
Plaintiff:
Genesis Management Resources Corp.
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv04023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Citibank, N.A. v. 88th Avenue Owner LLC et al
as 1:2024cv03730
Plaintiff:
Citibank, N.A.
Defendant:
88th Avenue Owner LLC, 89th Avenue Owner LLC, Meyer Chetrit and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03949
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1514 A Civil Action to Protect Against Retaliation in Fraud Cases
Melamed v. Citibank, N.A.
as 2:2024cv02495
Plaintiff:
Andrew Melamed
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
