Cases 21 - 30 of 66
Araujo et al v. CitiMortgage, Inc.
as 1:2015cv13558
Plaintiff:
Pedro Araujo and Ana Rosa
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ayoub v. CitiMortgage, Inc.
as 1:2015cv13218
Plaintiff:
Marie Claire Ayoub
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Saade v. PennyMac Loan Services, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv12275
Defendant:
PennyMac Loan Services, LLC , Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. , Christiana Trust and others
Plaintiff:
Jacques Saade
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Romanoff et al v. CitiMortgage Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv12268
Plaintiff:
David Romanoff and Karen Low-Romanoff
Defendant:
CitiMortgage Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association, Trustee for Prof-2013-M4 Remic Trust 1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Romanoff et al v. CitiMortgage Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv12268
Plaintiff:
David Romanoff and Karen Lowe-Romanoff
Defendant:
CitiMortgage Inc. and US Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Army v. CitiMortgage, Inc.
as 4:2015cv40016
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Lawrence F. Army, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Army v. CitiMortgage, Inc.
as 4:2015cv40015
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Lawrence F. Army, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Acosta v CitiMortgage Inc.
as 1:2014cv11973
Plaintiff:
Hector Acosta
Defendant:
CitiMortgage Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Bragel et al v. CitiMortgage, Inc.
as 1:2014cv10517
Plaintiff:
Kelley A. Bragel and Robert F. Bragel
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Trustees of the Spyglass Hill Condominium Trust v. Goldberg et al
as 1:2013cv12936
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Spyglass Hill Condominium Trust
Defendant:
Edward Goldberg, Beverly Goldberg, CitiMortgage, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
