Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Finnegan v. CITI et al
as 8:2017cv01994
Defendant:
CITI, CITI BANK N.A., CITI CORP CREDIT SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
Jack R. Finnegan
Jack R. Finnegan et al v. Citi, et al
as 8:2017cv01995
Defendant:
Maria C Chrislip, Citi, Citi Corp Credit Services and others
Plaintiff:
Jack R Finnegan
Arendas v. Citibank Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv06462
Plaintiff:
Ronald S. Arendas
Defendant:
Citibank Inc., Citibank (West) FSB, Citibank, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arendas v. Citibank Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv06462
Plaintiff:
Ronald S. Arendas
Defendant:
Citibank Inc., Citibank (West) FSB, Citibank, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Acosta v. Campbell, et al
as 6:2004cv00761
Plaintiff:
David Acosta
Defendant:
Marie D. Campbell , Gregg Dreilinger , Law Offices of David J. Stern, P.A. and others
Mediator:
J. Joaquin Fraxedas
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Huh v. Chase Home Finance et al
as 1:2009cv02292
Plaintiff:
Hwa Sun Huh and Hwa Sun Huh
Defendant:
Chase Home Finance, Chase Home Finance, Classic Lending Group, Inc. and others
Counter Claimant:
Citibank, N.A., Citibank, N.A. and Citibank, N.A.
Counter Defendant:
Hwa Sun Huh, Hwa Sun Huh and Hwa Sun Huh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
Type:
Other Statutes
Gurmohan Nagpal et al v. Ryland Mortgage et al
as 2:2009cv05599
Plaintiff:
Gurmohan Nagpal and Kiran Nagpal
Defendant:
Ryland Mortgage, Ryland Mortgage, Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Type:
Other Statutes
Amrhein v. Citibank Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv21681
Plaintiff:
Mike Amrhein
Defendant:
Citibank Inc., Citibank (West), FSB, Citibank, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Amrhein v. Citibank Inc. et al
as 4:2008cv05101
Plaintiff:
Mike Amrhein and Mike Amrhein
Defendant:
Citibank Inc., Citibank (West), FSB, Citibank, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
