Cases 31 - 40 of 580
In re: Treasury Securities Auc
as 22-943
Plaintiff:
Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, Beaver County Employees' Retirement Fund, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Marc Federighi, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Michael St. John, BNP Paribas Securities Corp., Bank of Nova Scotia, New York Agency and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
City of Pontiac Police and Fire Retirement System, On behalf of itself and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Pension Fund, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Health and Welfare Fund, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant:
BMO Capital Markets Corp., CIBC World Markets Corp., Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. and others
Chen v. Missfresh Limited et al
as 1:2022cv04065
Plaintiff:
Juan Chen, Maso Capital Investments Limited and Chelsea Fan
Defendant:
Missfresh Limited, Zheng Xu, Jun Wang and others
Petitioner:
Blackwell Partners LLC - Series A, Star V Partners LLC, Bingzheng Mao and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
In Re Mexican Government Bonds Antitrust Litigatio
as 22-2039
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Oklahoma Firefighters Pension & Retirement System, on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated, Electrical Workers Pension Fund Local 103, I.B.E.W., on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated, Government Employees' Retirement System of the Virgin Islands, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Banco Santander, S.A., Santander Investment Securities Inc., Santander Holdings USA, Inc. and others
Defendant:
John Does 1-10
Naya 1740 Fund Ltd. et al v. Coupang, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv08756
Plaintiff:
Naya 1740 Fund Ltd., Naya Coldwater Fund, Naya Master Fund LP and others
Defendant:
Coupang, Inc., Bom Suk Kim, Gaurav Anand and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Zaerpour v. UBS Group AG et al
as 1:2022cv07232
Plaintiff:
Scheil Zaerpour and Soheil Zaerpour
Defendant:
UBS Group AG, Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Loomis Sayles Trust Company LLC v. Citigroup Global Markets Inc
as 1:2022cv06706
Plaintiff:
Loomis Sayles Trust Company LLC
Defendant:
Citigroup Global Markets Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Advanced Analytics, Inc. v. Citigroup Global Markets, Inc.
as 22-1718
Appellant:
Advanced Analytics, Inc.
Counter Claimant:
Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., FKA Salomon Smith Barney Inc. and Yield Book, Inc., FKA Salomon Analytics, Inc.
Intervenor:
The American Prospect and Brandon Smith
IN RE MEXICAN GOVERNMENT BONDS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
as 1:2018cv02830
Defendant:
Citigroup Global Markets Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co., Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Oklahoma Firefighters Pension & Retirement System and Electrical Workers Pension Fund Local 103, I.B.E.W.
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Boston Retirement System, United Food and Commercial Workers Union and Participating Food Industry Employers Tri-State Pension Fund, Government Employees' Retirement System of the Virgin Islands and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Fiorilla v. Citigroup Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06189
Plaintiff:
John Leopoldo Fiorilla
Defendant:
Citigroup Inc., Citibank, N.A., Citigroup Global Markets Holdings, Inc. and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Bressler Amery & Ross, P.C. and Allen & Overy, LLP
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Civil Remedies: Racketeering (RICO) Act
West Palm Beach Police Pension Fund v. SelectQuote, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv08279
Plaintiff:
West Palm Beach Police Pension Fund
Defendant:
SelectQuote, Inc., Timothy Danker, Raffaele Sadun and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
