Cases 31 - 37 of 37
ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREMENT SYSTEM v. SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv01720
Plaintiff:
ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREMENT SYSTEM
Defendant:
SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION, FRED HASSAN, ROBERT J. BERTOLINI and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS, INC. v. THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER
as 2:2007cv02081
Plaintiff:
CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS, INC.
Defendant:
THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
SMITH BARNEY DIVISION OF CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS INC., THE v. CARUSO
as 3:2007cv01733
Plaintiff:
SMITH BARNEY DIVISION OF CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS INC., THE
Defendant:
ANTHONY CARUSO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Lutfy v. Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv00275
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lutfy, Gregory Lutfy, Gregory Lutfy and others
Defendant:
Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
IN RE: VONAGE INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERING (IPO) SECURITIES LITIGATION
as 3:2007cv00177
Movant:
THE DIRECTED SHARE GROUP and THE DIRECTED SHARE GROUP
Plaintiff:
KEVIN GIBBONS, DOUGLAS M. WERMAN, MARC WEINBERG and others
Defendant:
VONAGE HOLDINGS CORP., VONAGE HOLDINGS CORP., JEFFREY A. CITRON and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
ROVNER v. VONAGE HOLDINGS CORP. et al
as 3:2007cv00178
Plaintiff:
MARC ROVNER
Defendant:
VONAGE HOLDINGS CORP., BEAR STEARNS & CO., INC., BEAR STEARNS & CO., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
PINTO et al v. VONAGE HOLDINGS CORPORATION et al
as 3:2007cv00062
Plaintiff:
TIAGO PINTO and LEWIS MATTHEWS
Defendant:
VONAGE HOLDINGS CORPORATION, JEFFREY A. CITRON, MICHAEL SNYDER and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
