Cases 31 - 40 of 90
Nationstar Mortgage LLC v. Reed et al
as 7:2016cv02167
Plaintiff:
Nationstar Mortgage LLC
Defendant:
Sheila D. Reed and Citimortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fc Diversity - Foreclosure
Sutton v. CitiMortgage, Inc
as 1:2016cv01778
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc
Plaintiff:
Chantal Sutton
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2601
Johnson 'El v. CitiMortgage, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01024
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc., Does 1 through 100, Inclusive and Mortgage Electonic Registration System, Inc.
Plaintiff:
O. Valentine Johnson 'El
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Weaver v. Boriskin et al
as 1:2016cv00688
Defendant:
Sara Z. Boriskin, Esq., CitiMortgage, Inc., Gena Goldberger, Esq. and others
Plaintiff:
Everette Weaver
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00085
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Tocco v. Citimortgage, Inc.
as 1:2016cv00007
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Denise Tocco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rapillo v. Citimortgage, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv05976
Defendant:
Citimortgage, Inc. and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp a/k/a Freddie Mac
Plaintiff:
Michael Rapillo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Declaratory Judgemen
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv05309
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Reinhart v. CitiMortgage, Inc.
as 1:2015cv01095
Plaintiff:
Edward J. Reinhart
Respondent:
CitiMortgage, Inc. , Tom P. Rosicki , Deborah M. Gallo and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv04051
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
