Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv06492
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01051
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Alam v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2020cv01032
Defendant:
James W. McCamet, John F. Kelly, U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services and others
Plaintiff:
Md Nurul Alam
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv06656
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2011cv06075
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00842
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446
Allicock v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2009cv00866
Plaintiff:
Shawn Anthony Allicock
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security and United States Citizenship & Immigration Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Zheng et al v. U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services et al
as 6:2008mc06034
Plaintiff:
Ying Zheng and Qin Wei Lin
Defendant:
U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services, Michael Chertoff, Emilio Gonzalez and others
Woldeamanupel v. Myers et al
as 1:2008cv00540
Petitioner:
Demssachew Woldeamanupel
Respondent:
Julie L. Myers, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, US Citizenship & Immigration Services and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
