Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 ad Job Discrimination (Disability Act)
In Re: Kirstjen M. Nielsen
as 17-3345
Petitioner:
Kevin McAleenan, Secretary of Homeland Security, Jefferson B. Sessions III, United States Attorney General, Donald J. Trump, President of the United States and others
Respondent:
Martin Jonathan Batall Vidal, Make the Road New York, Antonio Alarcon and others
Amicus Curiae:
City of Los Angeles, California, City of Austin, Texas, City of Boston, Massachusetts and others
In Re: Elaine Duke
as 17-3345
Petitioner:
Elaine C. Duke, Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, Jefferson B. Sessions III, United States Attorney General, Donald J. Trump, President of the United States and others
Respondent:
Martin Jonathan Batall Vidal, Make the Road New York, Antonio Alarcon and others
Amicus Curiae:
City of Los Angeles, California, City of Austin, Texas, City of Boston, Massachusetts and others
Movant:
6Sense Insights, Inc., A Medium Corporation, Adobe Systems Incorporated and others
IN RE WEIGHT WATCHERS INTERNATIONAL, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION
as 1:2014cv01997
Lead Plaintiff:
KBC Asset Management NV and Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System
Plaintiff:
Vlad Kalika
Consolidated Plaintiff:
May Al Najjar
Petitioner:
CITY OF AUSTIN POLICE RETIREMENT SYSTEM and Construction Industry and Laborers Joint Pension Trust
Defendant:
Weight Watchers International, Inc., David Kirchhoff, James Chambers and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Kuriakose v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Com
as 12-4353
Plaintiff:
Jino Kuriakose, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and City of Austin Police Retirement System
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund
Defendant - Appellee:
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Company, Richard Syron, Patricia L. Cook and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
