Cases 11 - 20 of 5,500
Diggs v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv01546
Plaintiff:
Glenn Diggs
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Christopher Parker, Derrick Martin Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv03215
Plaintiff:
Darien Harris
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Devinn Jones, Isaac Lambert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Herbst v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv01679
Plaintiff:
Bradley Andrew Herbst
Defendant:
City Of Chicago and Fraternal Order of Police Lodge 7
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03189
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Ceballos v. Home Depot USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01398
Plaintiff:
Florencio Ceballos
Defendant:
Home Depot USA, Inc., Universal Protection Service, LLC, City of Chicago and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tinajero v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv01598
Plaintiff:
Jose Tinajero
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Reynaldo Guevara, Ernest Halvorsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Perez v. The City of Chicago
as 1:2024cv03077
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Perez
Defendant:
The City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02942
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Williams v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv01396
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Nicholas Evangelides, Dale Potter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Dampeer v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv02957
Plaintiff:
Monique Dampeer
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Erleen Banks, Daniel Johnson and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
