Cases 51 - 60 of 4,108
Doe v. Whitley et al
as 1:2024cv00561
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
William Whitley and The City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilson v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv00277
Plaintiff:
Dominick Wilson
Defendant:
John Doe, The City of Chicago and Francisco Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hodges v. Adanis et al
as 1:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Kawada Hodges
Defendant:
P.O. ADANIS, P.O. Anudsen, The City of Chicago and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lovaloy v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv00864
Plaintiff:
Dequan Lovaloy
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Thomas Bishop and Bryan Mordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nelson et al v. Sierzega et al
as 1:2024cv00641
Plaintiff:
Larice Nelson, Shyheim Hurde, Sammie Gage and others
Defendant:
William T. Sierzega, Quontez L. Harrington, Scott J. Pietryla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reed v. Zuley et al
as 1:2023cv17186
Plaintiff:
Carl Reed
Defendant:
Richard Zuley, Timothy Thompson, The City of Chicago and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Polewski v. The City of Chicago
as 1:2024cv01432
Plaintiff:
Stephen A. Polewski
Defendant:
The City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Benitez v. Bogucki et al
as 1:2023cv16896
Plaintiff:
Francisco Benitez
Defendant:
Jerome Bogucki, Raymond Schalk, Paul Zacharias and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holmes v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv00465
Plaintiff:
Larry Holmes
Defendant:
City of Chicago, David Hodgeman, B. J. Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Colon v. Noradin et al
as 1:2023cv16798
Plaintiff:
Edgardo Colon
Defendant:
Anthony F. Noradin, Samuel J. Cirone, William Brogan and others
Petitioner:
Tyrone Clay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
