Cases 31 - 40 of 73
Moore v. Gray et al
as 2:2015cv02555
Plaintiff:
Marchello Chantez Moore
Defendant:
Antonio Trevino Gray, Memphis Police Dept. and City of Memphis, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Sear Dept. Stores et al
as 2:2015cv02323
Plaintiff:
Willie Ervin Moore
Defendant:
Sear Dept. Stores, Shelby County Jail Complex, City of Memphis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rowan v. Workers' Compensation/Rowan Law Firm et al
as 2:2015cv02206
Plaintiff:
Brent A. Rowan
Defendant:
Workers' Compensation/Rowan Law Firm, City of Memphis, U.S. Dept. of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Memphis Police Dept. et al
as 2:2014cv02930
Plaintiff:
Armando Q. Anderson
Defendant:
Memphis Police Dept., City of Memphis, J. Knight and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joyner v. Phillips et al
as 2:2014cv02670
Plaintiff:
Troy Joyner, Jr.
Defendant:
Fredrick Phillips, M. Keaton, The City of Memphis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willis v. Reading et al
as 2:2014cv02362
Plaintiff:
Joe Willis
Defendant:
Fredrick Reading, Memphis Police Department, The City of Memphis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. City of Memphis et al
as 2:2014cv02295
Plaintiff:
Joseph E. Jones, III
Defendant:
City of Memphis, State of TN, Shelby County D.A. Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neal v. Weirich et al
as 2:2014cv02281
Plaintiff:
Mecos Neal
Defendant:
Amy Weirich, Memphis Police Department Robbery Division, Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prewitt v. City of Memphis et al
as 2:2013cv02884
Plaintiff:
Larry Lorenzo Prewitt, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Memphis, Mark Ward, Shelby County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthews v. Memphis Police Department et al
as 2:2013cv02665
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Matthews
Defendant:
Memphis Police Department, J. Bond and City of Memphis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
