Cases 41 - 50 of 54
Hancock v. The City of Rochester et al
as 6:2013cv06671
Plaintiff:
Winston Marcus Hancock
Defendant:
The City of Rochester, County of Monroe and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. The City Of Rochester et al
as 6:2013cv06588
Plaintiff:
Trevis D. Baker
Defendant:
The City Of Rochester and Patrick M. O'Flynn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. City of Rochester, N.Y. et al
as 6:2013cv06468
Plaintiff:
Gerald Smith
Defendant:
City of Rochester, N.Y. and County of Monroe, N.Y.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. State of New York et al
as 6:2013cv06301
Plaintiff:
Luis A. Rodriguez
Defendant:
State of New York, County of Monroe, City of Rochester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dowdell v. City of Rochester et al
as 6:2011cv06493
Plaintiff:
Christen Dowdell
Defendant:
City of Rochester, Rochester Police Department, Aaron Colletti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodwin v. LoTempio et al
as 1:2011cv00748
Plaintiff:
Daryl Goodwin
Defendant:
Charles LoTempio, G. Person, Rochester Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nowlin v. 2 jane doe female et al
as 1:2011cv00712
Plaintiff:
Quintin A. Nowlin
Defendant:
2 jane doe female, Arresting Rochester Police Officer ID: ROC2122, Rochester Police Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fuqua v. City of Rochester
as 1:2010cv00893
Plaintiff:
Tyrauice Fuqua
Defendant:
City of Rochester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fagan v. City of Rochester N.Y. et al
as 1:2010cv00479
Plaintiff:
Michael a. Fagan
Defendant:
City of Rochester N.Y., Rochester Police Dept., Mathew Klien and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deponceau v. United States of America et al
as 9:2010cv00338
Plaintiff:
Victor Altheus DePonceau
Defendant:
United States of America, New York State, Monroe County and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
